"154 million lives saved in 50 years : 5 charts on the global success of vaccines" : that's headline as the argument like a promotion by an article (with the photo, see above) we can read online into The Conversation (May 13th). Obviously it's a reminder. Why is it ? Is it useful to remind us, maybe except for fanatism which always, systematically, refuses vaccines ? A religious one and current fanatism like any extremism (political one, too) is going to endanger the world with some conflicts and attrition wars like war against Ukraine or Israel ; could vaccination be linked to some conflicts ? Okay, anyhow, vaccines are synonymous with progress, civilization health advance. But which need to remind us ? It reports a new research from the University of Sidney ; I quote, because I find some ambiguity into that defense of vaccines : "But global drops in vaccines coverage pose a risk." COVERAGE or INFORMATION, or code of ethics any journalism must respect. GLOBAL prevents us from any uncautious generalization. Here is the point : is there a risk overshadowing TRUTH especially when a scandal can come to light like a reapparing ghost or old past ?

COVID19 vaccines are questionable because of damages they produced; and I cannot (I don't want to, sure) imagine that Children Health Defense lie to all os us ? They do defend vaccines, they (there ar