¡Felicidades! Tu apoyo al autor se ha enviado correctamente
Which Campaign ?

Which Campaign ?

Publicado el 27, jun., 2024 Actualizado 27, jun., 2024 Cultura
time 4 min
0
Me encanta
0
Solidaridad
0
Wow
thumb comentario
lecture leer
0
reacción

En Panodyssey, puedes leer hasta 30 publicaciones al mes sin iniciar sesión. Disfruta de 29 articles más para descubrir este mes.

Para obtener acceso ilimitado, inicia sesión o crea una cuenta haciendo clic a continuación, ¡es gratis! Inicar sesión

Which Campaign ?

 

The photo, an empty space before turmoil show is from CNN (June 27th) about a big issue : the Supreme Court at stake, because such a Court could rule on Trump's criminal impunity in the coming hours. It would be a shame whereas the Defendant is charged by so many reasons and FELONY - the Espionage issue, the disrespect of The Rule of Law - is particularly serious for someone who pretends to the White House given IMMUNITY cannot a good fair and respectful motive for any candidate, neither too regarding any - American - citizen. But meanwhile, let's have some fun : on MSNBC ("ALL IN with Chris Hayes", June 26th), Elie Mystal talks about Supreme Court as big issue, as a corrupted one for most part of it as it appears but (quote) here is a very interesting and fascinating comparison : "According to Brett Kavanaugh and the conservatives, it's only bribery if it comes from the briberie region of France. Everything else is just sparkling corruption." Let's appreciate, a South Mafia like both an American and French Riviera and Mar-a-Lago (Florida or a South America) as the spot for having hidden STOLEN (CLASSIFIED) DOCUMENTS which don't belong to Trump but to the State.

But the issue of CORRUPTION is also the issue of ACCOUNTABILITY DENIAL (a mind issue, maybe a brain one). Trials ahead, for sure ; and more than we could have imagined. Strange now is the last Trump joke (Twitter, "Republicans against Trump", June 25th) : "I will not give one penny to any school that gas a vaccine mandate". Oh, so charming now Fauci cannot escape from any almost compliant interview, so pleasant that covidian narrative is not yet disputed (except by a challenger who seems sometimes so closed to the former President but who won't debate) but which ruled under Trump administration, the same who got ill : even not immunization at the top of the State from the wicked virus like a deep State could be. Gamer he was, then gamer he is, gamer he remains. Bluff/Mob : interests collusion, countries and staff conspiracy : okay, but on that point surely game is over.

My purpose is actually to come back to an enlarged FOCUS with a Campaign whose signs can be surprising because of kinds of trials we can expect now. Now for example, it is as if we attend to an Assange Campaign : BIG ISSUE (let's pay attention please, like a big lie and/or a big deal). Why ? Because a false political component is still at stake regarding WikiLeaks boss release. Indeed more prudent was today than yesterday the Australian online press magazine The Conversation (June 27th) , more than some openly pro-Assange media like "The Project" (twitter, June 25th) : could be disputed the fact, the opinion say his supporters, that he endangered lives: the U. S. long said that. But the context is, was a war one with the Espionage charge, a very serious one. Yesterday, today : past, present. "The Associated Press" (June 26th), a media against the challenger who won't debate claimed is a still a supporter of Julian Assange, and a protester against institutions or old AGENCIES like CIA without ever aiming to Russian ones. What did such a media yesterday report ? That the ASSANGE CASE is certainly NOT OVER. I quote : "After pleading guilty to publishing U. S. military secrets...."  Time is thus for him a Campaign one, like Trump. The media RFK Jr criticizes continues : his "lawyer called the prosecution by the U. S." "a dangerous precedent" after he accepted the plea deal. But why did he accept ? A dangerous one, like a likely Trump one ?  But what does The Conversation say today ? It exhibits two photos of Julian Assange, one of a triumphant man (he is not) or of a winner (who is not at all).  He even can be no more a legend or a hero, because he compromised himself by such a deal. But why ? And not a political secret deal, no : the clean independent DOJ one. I quote : "In pleading guilty to one count under the U. S. Espionage Act as part of a plea deal, the WikiLeaks founder's case has left some large legal concepts unresolved." Sure, so UNRESOLVED and UNTOLD ones we'll have the chance to enunciate and connect each to others, like secrecy he hates (he stands for declassification !) on the contrary of privacy he values : very strange view when we read Mr Assange for he is a writer who tends to conceptualize. Strange reasoning, given PRIVACY is a concept SECTRECY one includes like State is made of citizen he must protect (for security from many viewpoints, life, identity, murder and so on). Could it be responsible to assert such a disjonction ? Corrupted mind, adding hacker crime upon private mails of H. Clinton during Presidential campaign; meetings, trades, hiring among others BIG ISSUES into a Campaign within Russia matters as enemy, including in the Middle-East

Here is the showman, another one (sic) : "Julian Assange told Anthony Albanese he 'saved his life' after landing in Australia". Jesus, what does it mean ? That the so-called deal was between U. S. and Australia ? Seriously, a deal like that (which only regards America) excludes any hostage issue by only but a negotiation, not any surrender. Presumptuous, so vain individual facing a DOJ which he  would not respect like he did (not) regarding any West authorities (CIA ghost, never KGB.....).and on which he would permit to congratulate Australia Prime Minister as a Saver (!). A player, for sure (a gamer), like a MONKEY. Just but SHOW OFF. Let's quote the following text of the article : "The prime minister spoke with Assange moments after the WikiLeaks founder touched down in Australia after his guilty plea in the Northern Mariana Island earlier in the day." No doubt Mr Albanese is a polite man with a big challenging task as Prime whose Assange affair is a mean one (let's have a look to geography), the opposite of that man who has to seize any chance for a non accountability, like a MASK but not a covidian one (rather like anonymous ones). For sure : TRIAL AHEAD.

                                                                                                *

To my both murdered parents, my missing family (like my son who is still alive like me), as well as to my dear countrymen and friends (no doubt) of The Rule of Law.

FOR/TO RESISTANCE

NO LIE AT ALL, especially when professional code of ethics is at stake.

God Bless America,

God Bless Israel,

God Bless Ukraine.

lecture 35 lecturas
thumb comentario
0
reacción

Comentario (0)

¿Te gustan las publicaciones de Panodyssey?
¡Apoya a sus escritores independientes!

Seguir descubriendo el universo Cultura

donate Puedes apoyar a tus escritores favoritos