Congratulations! Your support has been successfully sent to the author
avatar
CONSTITUTION vs TRUMP- A "Dangerous Precedent" - 

CONSTITUTION vs TRUMP- A "Dangerous Precedent" - 

Published Jul 5, 2024 Updated Jul 5, 2024 Culture
time 4 min
0
Love
0
Solidarity
0
Wow
thumb 0 comments
lecture 160 readings
0
reactions

On Panodyssey, you can read up to 10 publications per month without being logged in. Enjoy5 articles to discover this month.

To gain unlimited access, log in or create an account by clicking below. It's free! Log in

CONSTITUTION vs TRUMP- A "Dangerous Precedent" - 

My photo (source : Morning Brew, June 30th) intends with abit fun to make advance ideas  and understand why hurrying is important during a RACE as ELECTION and so generally speaking : the three natural states in Nature you can see  - liquid, solid, gaseous : they all necessarily matter -  are here as componants of "Department of Progress". So, let's go, keep on going.  

Nerves could have been on edge, first and several months ago by the unfitted Judge Aileen Cannon in her silenced defense of Trump Defendant especially regarding CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS; she always tried to interfere, offered incorrect assertions of law, then showed as "favoritism" regarding the Felon. Glenn Kirschner repeatedly was angry and at the same time mocked : she really needs a mirror and should read press regarding herself as judge. Again CLASSIFIED MATERIAL in discussion, whereas Trump endlessly attacks institutions. And the former prosecutor and columnist as well as reporter of Justice Matters" to recap : "Constitution vs Supreme Court". He said : we must know who we - the People - we vote for : either Trump is guilty or he is not. But we must know and trial(s) are not to be delayed, he even cannot be seriously be exonerated of some charges; adding Republican billionaires are involved in his campaign with insanity and corruption from many viewpoints (think to Clarence for example).

So, things got worse. And Reuters Daily Briefing (July 2sd) with a frontpage like "Elections around the world" and in regard to the far right party generally speaking, talked about a "dangerous precedent" regarding SUPREME COURT decision on presidential immunity. A REAL DANGEROUS PRECEDENT, not the so-called false [fake] precedent as stupid allegation (The Conversation) regarding fro example As

This is a Prime publication

To access, subscribe to the Creative Room ELECTION(S) and TRIALS by Cecile Voisset

Membership benefits:

check

Full access to exclusive content and archives

check

Early access to new content

check

Comment on the author's publications and join the community of subscribers

check

Get a notification for each new publication

Subscribing is a way of supporting an author in the long run

Subscribe to the Creative Room
lecture 160 readings
thumb 0 comments
0
reactions

Le bloc commentaire est réservé aux abonnés.

Subscribing is a way of supporting an author in the long run

Subscribe to the Creative Room

Are you enjoying reading on Panodyssey?
Support their independent writers!

Prolong your journey in this universe Culture
Evangéliser
Evangéliser

Un mot d'un dictionnaire, ma définition, votre sourire, ma joieA force...

Bernard Ducosson
1 min
Queer ? Qui es-tu ?
Queer ? Qui es-tu ?

Queer ? Qui es-tu ? Fin XIXe en GB, Le mot « queer » est un m...

Sandrine Aragon
9 min
Mathusalem
Mathusalem

Un mot d'un dictionnaire, ma définition, votre sourire, ma joieL'autre nom d'un divin vieux aya...

Bernard Ducosson
1 min
Jour 167
Jour 167

Les dieux meurent quand l'Homme cesse d’y croire et l'Homme meurt tant qu'il continue d'y croire.

Franck Labat
1 min

donate You can support your favorite writers

promo

Download the Panodyssey mobile app