Congratulazioni! Il tuo sostegno è stato inviato con successo all'autore
avatar
CONSTITUTION vs TRUMP- A "Dangerous Precedent" - 

CONSTITUTION vs TRUMP- A "Dangerous Precedent" - 

Pubblicato 5 lug 2024 Aggiornato 5 lug 2024 Cultura
time 4 min
0
Adoro
0
Solidarietà
0
Wow
thumb commento
lecture lettura
0
reazione

Su Panodyssey puoi leggere fino a 10 pubblicazioni al mese senza effettuare il login. Divertiti 2 articles da scoprire questo mese.

Per avere accesso illimitato ai contenuti, accedi o crea un account cliccando qui sotto: è gratis! Accedi

CONSTITUTION vs TRUMP- A "Dangerous Precedent" - 

My photo (source : Morning Brew, June 30th) intends with abit fun to make advance ideas  and understand why hurrying is important during a RACE as ELECTION and so generally speaking : the three natural states in Nature you can see  - liquid, solid, gaseous : they all necessarily matter -  are here as componants of "Department of Progress". So, let's go, keep on going.  

Nerves could have been on edge, first and several months ago by the unfitted Judge Aileen Cannon in her silenced defense of Trump Defendant especially regarding CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS; she always tried to interfere, offered incorrect assertions of law, then showed as "favoritism" regarding the Felon. Glenn Kirschner repeatedly was angry and at the same time mocked : she really needs a mirror and should read press regarding herself as judge. Again CLASSIFIED MATERIAL in discussion, whereas Trump endlessly attacks institutions. And the former prosecutor and columnist as well as reporter of Justice Matters" to recap : "Constitution vs Supreme Court". He said : we must know who we - the People - we vote for : either Trump is guilty or he is not. But we must know and trial(s) are not to be delayed, he even cannot be seriously be exonerated of some charges; adding Republican billionaires are involved in his campaign with insanity and corruption from many viewpoints (think to Clarence for example).

So, things got worse. And Reuters Daily Briefing (July 2sd) with a frontpage like "Elections around the world" and in regard to the far right party generally speaking, talked about a "dangerous precedent" regarding SUPREME COURT decision on presidential immunity. A REAL DANGEROUS PRECEDENT, not the so-called false [fake] precedent as stupid allegation (The Conversation) regarding fro example As

Questo è un articolo Prime

Per accedervi, iscriviti alla Creative Room ELECTION(S) and TRIALS di Cecile Voisset

Vantaggi dell'iscrizione:

check

Accesso completo a contenuti esclusivi e archivi

check

Accesso preferenziale a futuri contenuti

check

Commenta le pubblicazioni dell'autore e unisciti alla sua community

check

Ricevi una notifica per ogni nuovo articolo

Iscriversi significa sostenere un autore a lungo termine

Iscriviti alla Creative Room
lecture 160 letture
thumb commento
0
reazione

Le bloc commentaire est réservé aux abonnés.

Iscriversi significa sostenere un autore a lungo termine

Iscriviti alla Creative Room

Ti piacciono gli articoli su Panodyssey?
Sostieni gli autori indipendenti!

Proseguire l'esplorazione dell'universo Cultura
Evangéliser
Evangéliser

Un mot d'un dictionnaire, ma définition, votre sourire, ma joieA force...

Bernard Ducosson
1 min
Queer ? Qui es-tu ?
Queer ? Qui es-tu ?

Queer ? Qui es-tu ? Fin XIXe en GB, Le mot « queer » est un m...

Sandrine Aragon
9 min
Mathusalem
Mathusalem

Un mot d'un dictionnaire, ma définition, votre sourire, ma joieL'autre nom d'un divin vieux aya...

Bernard Ducosson
1 min
Jour 167
Jour 167

Les dieux meurent quand l'Homme cesse d’y croire et l'Homme meurt tant qu'il continue d'y croire.

Franck Labat
1 min

donate Puoi sostenere i tuoi scrittori preferiti

promo

Download the Panodyssey mobile app