¡Felicidades! Tu apoyo al autor se ha enviado correctamente
avatar
CONSTITUTION vs TRUMP- A "Dangerous Precedent" - 

CONSTITUTION vs TRUMP- A "Dangerous Precedent" - 

Publicado el 5, jul, 2024 Actualizado 5, jul, 2024 Cultura
time 4 min
0
Me encanta
0
Solidaridad
0
Wow
thumb comentario
lecture leer
0
reacción

No puedes leer más publicaciones este mes sin iniciar sesión.

Para aprovechar al máximo las nuevas funciones, inicia sesión o regístrate haciendo clic a continuación, ¡es gratis! Inicar sesión

CONSTITUTION vs TRUMP- A "Dangerous Precedent" - 

My photo (source : Morning Brew, June 30th) intends with abit fun to make advance ideas  and understand why hurrying is important during a RACE as ELECTION and so generally speaking : the three natural states in Nature you can see  - liquid, solid, gaseous : they all necessarily matter -  are here as componants of "Department of Progress". So, let's go, keep on going.  

Nerves could have been on edge, first and several months ago by the unfitted Judge Aileen Cannon in her silenced defense of Trump Defendant especially regarding CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS; she always tried to interfere, offered incorrect assertions of law, then showed as "favoritism" regarding the Felon. Glenn Kirschner repeatedly was angry and at the same time mocked : she really needs a mirror and should read press regarding herself as judge. Again CLASSIFIED MATERIAL in discussion, whereas Trump endlessly attacks institutions. And the former prosecutor and columnist as well as reporter of Justice Matters" to recap : "Constitution vs Supreme Court". He said : we must know who we - the People - we vote for : either Trump is guilty or he is not. But we must know and trial(s) are not to be delayed, he even cannot be seriously be exonerated of some charges; adding Republican billionaires are involved in his campaign with insanity and corruption from many viewpoints (think to Clarence for example).

So, things got worse. And Reuters Daily Briefing (July 2sd) with a frontpage like "Elections around the world" and in regard to the far right party generally speaking, talked about a "dangerous precedent" regarding SUPREME COURT decision on presidential immunity. A REAL DANGEROUS PRECEDENT, not the so-called false [fake] precedent as stupid allegation (The Conversation) regarding fro example As

Este es un artículo Prime

Para poder acceder, suscríbete a la Creative Room ELECTION(S) and TRIALS de Cecile Voisset

Beneficios de los miembros:

check

Acceso completo a contenido y archivos exclusivos

check

Acceso anticipado a contenido futuro

check

Comenta las publicaciones del autor y únete a la comunidad de seguidores

check

Recibe una notificación por cada artículo nuevo

Suscribirse significa apoyar a un autor a largo plazo

Suscríbete a la Creative Room
lecture 154 lecturas
thumb comentario
0
reacción

No puedes leer más publicaciones este mes sin iniciar sesión.

Para aprovechar al máximo las nuevas funciones, inicia sesión o regístrate haciendo clic a continuación, ¡es gratis! Inicar sesión

Le bloc commentaire est réservé aux abonnés.

Suscribirse significa apoyar a un autor a largo plazo

Suscríbete a la Creative Room

¿Te gustan las publicaciones de Panodyssey?
¡Apoya a sus escritores independientes!

Seguir descubriendo el universo Cultura
Auvergne : la légende du lac Pavin
Auvergne : la légende du lac Pavin

Auvergne : la légende du lac PavinLes variations sur le même thème sont deux visions d'une légende régionale, l...

Jean-Christophe Mojard
3 min

donate Puedes apoyar a tus escritores favoritos

promo

Download the Panodyssey mobile app