On March 20th, a tweet (Twitter, by Australians For Assange : @Aus4Assange... ) released such a formula as Legalize Truth ('free Assange'). Fine, certainly a relevant one in those revealing days of bluff politic and business showcase as well as serious criminal investigations : the (CLASSIFIED) DOCUMENTS/FILES CASE with which American Justice (FBI raid in Mar-a-Lago, DOJ) is indeed rightfully interesting with (hopefully for Democracy). Legalize like declassify, that's how it can be understood. What should be DECLASSIFY (since the stolen documents by Trump and because of such a robbery or thief) ? 

Still I won't stand up for Julian Assange as he could think or as most people could imagine. I mean his view on SECRETS. But secret issue not only seems (to be) but also is at stake concerning NAMES (proper nouns, perhaps of guilties or criminals ...., or names for illegal situations...., or true ones of innocents.... don't know). Assange himself is not the very name of the man; books do exist (including one of his) tell that. So the above formula is right in that sense that it opens (on purpose) not a Pandora Box but one possible past until now couldn't (why ?). In another terms, weather is clearing like Truth is coming, and truth is coming because speech is little by little enunciating ; reality needs to be told in the same time ongoing investigation is productive, fertile. No need to be journalist (professional code of ethics must be relearned as values Democracy like courage - free speech - and real [political] commitment), like Assange ; actually we know dis/mis/information (see the shameful 'Fox News') has been very harmful with any kind of propaganda (false post-truth era or fak