Which line(s) of Defence ?
Su Panodyssey puoi leggere fino a 10 pubblicazioni al mese senza effettuare il login. Divertiti 9 articles da scoprire questo mese.
Per avere accesso illimitato ai contenuti, accedi o crea un account cliccando qui sotto: è gratis!
Accedi
Which line(s) of Defence ?
I don't talk about Trump (I don't care regarding such an individual), I don't worry about Defendant Trump; I don't, I don't want to. No, I'm talking about Assange who keeps on following a very bad line of defence with a bad team beside but not only beside him. Of course, the WikiLeaks boss (founder) cannot utterly be condemned but he can be condemned ; if not he is convicted. Julian Assange indeed cannot be innocent, he is not. In another words, he is guilty or absolutely NOT PURE. what does it mean, from Assange viewpoint which relies on some voices like Robert Francis Kennedy Jr one ? The last or lately one I heard about of is Roger Waters one (see Twitter, May 30th) : "Our voices will become louder and louder and louder until Julian Assange is set free. If we no longer have a voice, we're done". My voice is mine, don't want to be united with another one ; rather with my countrymen in an America which is a DEMOCRACY, and United State
Questo è un articolo Prime
Per accedervi, iscriviti alla Creative Room THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA di Cecile Voisset
Vantaggi dell'iscrizione:
Accesso completo a contenuti esclusivi e archivi
Accesso preferenziale a futuri contenuti
Commenta le pubblicazioni dell'autore e unisciti alla sua community
Ricevi una notifica per ogni nuovo articolo
Iscriversi significa sostenere un autore a lungo termine
Iscriviti alla Creative Room